Tuesday, 13 March 2012
The intellectual and singularity.
We need to redefine what constitutes an 'intellectual'. Wikipedia defines it:" an intellectual is a person who uses intellect in either a professional or an individual capacity". In an abstract way this is still usable. But what does an intellectual need to know? What topics should she or he be able to discuss in an intelligent manner? Even to discuss a topic at a basic level one has to have a knowledge base. Intellectual 1.0 was/is, typically, a voracious and eclectic reader. Intellectual 2.0 would also have that kind of an appetite but combines it with solid search and computing skills. But what about Intellectual 3.0? Kurzweil's Singularity would turn us all into a combination of Einsteins, Newtons, Hawkings, Curies etc. But will that make us true intellectuals in the old style? I doubt it.